Start with one reimbursement problem.
Orchid connects adjudicated claims to the payer context and evidence that apply, showing what appears supported, what's uncertain, and what deserves attention.
An initial Review works alongside your existing billing workflow and does not require changing active claim submission.
We work with a limited number of qualified organizations and confirm fit, evidence, and scope before each Review begins.
A good Review starts small.
One recurring issue
Start with a reimbursement question that has already appeared in claims or remittance evidence.
One defined claim set
Focus on one provider or client cohort, or one practice's recurring claim population.
One responsible reviewer
Your team evaluates the findings and decides what to do next.
What Orchid looks at.
Claim + payment result
What was billed and how it adjudicated.
What actually applies
The payer context and date that determine which requirements apply, plus the evidence available.
Patterns + gaps
What repeats and what the available evidence cannot settle.
Accepted Reviews use properly de-identified adjudicated professional-claim and remittance evidence exchanged through a non-public method confirmed before transfer.
Do not send evidence through the public website or Contact form.
What you get back.
What appears supported
See where the available evidence points.
What remains uncertain
See what the evidence does not settle.
What deserves attention
Give your reviewer a clearer place to start.
A focused written findings summary and founder walkthrough covering supported observations, uncertainty, evidence gaps, and potential next actions.
Qualified people remain responsible for decisions and action. Orchid does not make autonomous billing decisions.
Findings support qualified human review and do not guarantee payment or payer acceptance.
Bring one problem.
Talk through the issue, the evidence available, and whether Orchid Review may be a fit.
Qualified early organizations may receive one focused initial Review at no cost.