Bring evidence to the reimbursement decisions that consume senior reviewer time.
Orchid helps RCM teams review difficult claims against applicable payer evidence, identify what needs attention, and give reviewers a defensible basis for the next decision.
Orchid Review is available to a limited number of qualified RCM organizations supporting professional specialty claims within Orchid's current scope, and qualified professional specialty practices.
RCM scale gets harder where judgment is difficult to standardize.
Scrubbers and edit engines can identify formatting problems, missing fields, and coding conflicts. The harder reimbursement questions turn on which payer requirement applied and whether the available evidence supports what was billed.
Senior expertise becomes an escalation point.
Difficult reimbursement questions tend to accumulate with the people who have the most payer and specialty experience.
Payer research consumes review time.
Determining which requirement applies can require moving between policies, dates, claim context, and supporting evidence.
Distributed teams can reach different answers.
When evidence and rationale are fragmented, similar cases can be escalated or resolved differently.
Put the evidence closer to the first reviewer.
Retrospective findings are intended to clarify what may warrant action now, reveal patterns worth monitoring, and reduce how much a reviewer has to reconstruct before deciding.
Start with what happened
Review adjudicated claims and remittance evidence to see where payment, adjustment, or denial patterns deserve a closer look.
Connect the applicable evidence
Examine whether the available evidence supports what was billed, and what may warrant correction, follow-up, or no further action.
Keep reviewers accountable
Give the reviewer a focused basis for the next decision instead of a reconstruction task. Orchid does not autonomously code, alter, or submit claims.
Small enough to evaluate before it changes anything.
Orchid confirms fit, evidence, scope, and capacity before any Review begins. Historical claims are the starting point, so an initial Review does not require changing the active claim-submission workflow.
01
If there is a fit, start with one bounded problem.
Define the specialty, payer or issue family, historical claim population, available de-identified evidence, reviewers, and the questions to answer.
02
Review what Orchid finds together.
Compare Orchid's findings with qualified reviewer judgment, including disagreements and cases where evidence is insufficient.
03
Measure what changed.
Look at decision usefulness, reviewer agreement, recurring patterns, time requirements, and supported financial opportunity without treating modeled value as realized value.
04
Then decide whether to expand.
More providers, additional issue families, or no further work. The first engagement does not require belief in Orchid's entire roadmap.
Start where Orchid has the most depth today.
Orchid is deepest today in outpatient podiatry professional-claim issues. For RCM organizations serving multiple specialties, podiatry can provide a bounded first cohort for evaluating the workflow before any broader scope is considered.
Current examples are illustrative and use representative data.
A focused way to begin
Bring one bounded reimbursement question.
Orchid confirms fit, evidence, and scope before an accepted Review begins.
Learn about Orchid ReviewBring one reimbursement workflow into focus.
Start with a founder-led, 15-to-30-minute conversation about a reimbursement workflow or recurring claim issue and whether a focused Orchid Review may be a fit.